Next was a flyby by a B-1 Lancer. The B-1 is another aircraft with a rocky road to development.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6bv5qClLQ1HCL4IFDDHK1soih49AgDG6-4nIOSYsc9xKKeRDACqAjEj0c2CTcLECeE-2Y3452yKpTr_nDaW3_Yvlrvcx7omiMoltwJDD0vH4FeDiByYWqyE5FKbhRs0y7hjAUM-UQERd4/s320/bone1.jpg)
The B-1 was first envisioned in the 1960's as a replacement to the B-52 Stratofortress. The intial B-1A was developed in the 1970's and 4 prototypes were developed. It was originally to be a high altitude bomber but that change and it became a low altitude penatrator.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkuW3gLHBkkMt5Yg4e9bg5Npxrm9pcAAdkxWe7oD5MCDNJdNRnHhsfh7AqvwkbSE-E3_Xp1K29QbK3gID26__XOzJUcGwqaMrCBia5nwiBeVv5wfO-Okv0_2afwS_mIct3aTLlUn8JXSt0/s320/bone2.jpg)
With the defection of a MiG-25 in 1975, it was discovered that the Soviets had lookdown-shootdown capability in their radars. This meant that a low level penetrator would be vulnerable and the program was cancelled in 1977. However flight tests would continue.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-8qbGXFSlpv2oLjHfqtUJ7BIz3uQOMPhhcwXiYv_Vn4V9uwDUUtJh2uqS4CWw9sq4XyVlUNuwpomuYUR791XoN9OPk6zGAnYAAUNVa43xq0mZHBih82yKSjduGr6pG-E-bLPer9Si-vxA/s320/bone3.jpg)
With Reagan, the B-1 program was reinstated as the B-1B. There are some notable differences between the B-1A and the B-1B, the most noticable is the absense of a spine down the back of the plane. This gave the aircraft a much lower radar cross section.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg_4poBsye0xRw-883dkBV06QvYMtH2w0bYKLvyYu5r5LhUP_XB0472JvRxxOnOTwoGgBrdt7PFBwANtvRFo0oCHrALsknI4K3KYAuGkTFJIN-iH-YaTCwKx5izKLCenA7HjBB5GJ_ciBD4/s320/bone4.jpg)
Cost overruns meant that only 100 planes would be built. This meant that it would never quite replace the B-52 but supplement it.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLXmvD795mOrwlLS_zJ6UWJkdavwnBrbfFDfM2epJgqByrPocdNQYI9rqwaBZn4JUhqnVrb8-tLPZXz7k07ToeLWhjYVWK7EV5uzF3jUt599TEO7ZLK1obWbzRtwN6UofqdR1UJtIrGhfx/s320/bone5.jpg)
During the 80's, it was mostly used as a nuclear bomber. This changed when it was converted to conventional use as well. It can carry more bombs than the B-52 (but still isn't as cool).
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZAE-e27XwzxcsWQ3wFrlgvauJptyIdhcV2-AJ6c8oV7ztax-boArUUtq1GyoiSVydt0inXfu9U21ldRbdCjDLvOp8I0Kpe2Xmk7HxG8lvUInf8ldiZng6dM2Oz0i4xeyC9ln9qZGvLsHu/s320/bone6.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibiePMYQGWcKjctIcFfH2UQXpIzeoUfnXFOxeEinc7858gpJ5VZcJRThidhE0DBnvtAakFZAZX4dH9dhAeUKOoewCd8opSYSvCBlFdqhjeRHyqx9xO-C_fcE_5Hi7WCcHiV_YyqVhc2nNX/s320/bone7.jpg)
I do have to admit, it was pretty neat as this plane flew over. You could actually feel the ground rumble. I would hate to be on the business end of one of these.
2 comments:
I got the opportunity to sit in one of these at Wright Patterson. The B-1B was never the most effective weapon in the fleet, but by my measure even from an up-close perspective this is one of the most elegantly curved planes that's ever flown. Just beautiful to look at even with the parking brake on.
S.
I think it is a cool looking aircraft. If I remember correctly, it can carry more than a B-52 but it is not the most efficient aircraft in the fleet.
Post a Comment